 |
The
Lymington Society
|
 |
||||
Weekly Planning Search - Mar 17th 2010
95286
- FORMER WEBBS FACTORY SITE, BRIDGE ROAD
registration
date: 09/03/2010
Location:
Proposal: Mixed use development
comprising 205 private dwellings; 93 affordable dwellings; 10 live/work units;
100 bed hotel; restaurant; office accommodation; 1 retail unit; pedestrian
bridge over railway; riverside walkway; car parking & access (Removal
of Condition 3 of Planning Permission 04/82337 to enable occupation of buildings
to be phased with remediation of the site in accordance with an agreed scheme
to deal with any contamination of the site),
Statutory Class: Other Small Scale developments
Consulted:
History:
80580 05/02/2004 Mixed use development
refused - appeal withdrawn Paxton
Holdings
82337 09/08/2004 Mixed use development
granted Paxton Holdings
87244 08/02/2006 Amendment to 82337
- care home for hotel refused - appeal
allowed Redrow
93803 30/04/2009 mini-roundabout (outline
consent) invalidated Redrow
94440 20/08/2009 Mini roundabout at
existing T junction invalidated
- appeal awaited Redrow
95309 03/03/2010 Extension of time
limit of 82337 consultation Redrow
95286 09/03/2010 Removal of Condition
3 of 82337 consultation Redrow
95287 09/03/2010 Lawful Development
Certificate consultation Redrow
Comment: The essential bit is that
in bold type above. I have reproduced
below the conditions attached to 82337, from which it can be seen (bold type)
that Condition 3 deals with the purposes of the proposed restaurant, while
Condition 7 deals with decontamination. This application is accordingly difficult to
understand. On the other hand, the
application is subsidiary to 95309, covered last week, on which we should
concentrate our attention, so expending further time on it is probably not
worth while.
A point which emerged from investigation of this application is that the
appeal decision on 87244, which allowed a care home to replace the approved
hotel, included a condition that construction should start before 1 May 2010
- see also extract reproduced below.
Recommendation: None
for the moment
95287 - FORMER WEBBS FACTORY SITE, BRIDGE ROAD
registration
date: 09/03/2010
Location:
Proposal: Construction of
3 arm mini roundabout (Lawful Development Certificate that permission is not
required for proposal),
Statutory Class: Other minor development
Consulted: neighbours 2, others
14
History: see 93803 (outline) and 94440 (full), above
Comment: The case officer
comments: "The issue for consideration in respect of this application
will be based purely on a legal opinion as to whether planning permission
would be required for the proposed roundabout." The important point, which will be a feature
of next week's appeal, is that even if planning permission is not required,
that doesn't mean that Redrow can just go ahead and dig up the Queen's highway.
For a full exposition, see the statement of case copied from the appeal
documents by NFDC on to the application website
Recommendation: No action
94966 - 18 NEWBRIDGE WAY PENNINGTON
registration
date: 09/03/2010
Location: Bungalow half way along
Elm Avenue/Newbridge Way
Proposal: Summerhouse
Statutory Class: Householder developments
Consulted: neighbours 16, others
5
History: none
Comment: A substantial summer house, but I am surprised
it needs planning permission.
Recommendation: No action
95319 - Land adjoining 4 EDWARDS CLOSE PENNINGTON
registration
date: 11/03/2010
Location: between Lodge Road and
Ramley Road, behind the Vicarage
Proposal: Bungalow
Statutory Class: Minor Dwellings
Consulted: neighbours 8, others
11
History: 92905 - House on Land
of the vicarage, Ramley Road, which was part of
a site shared with the current application and 95319 below - granted 12/1/2009
Comment: This is on part of a larger site onceowned by
the Bishop of Winchester, now subdivided.
The new access to Edwards Close might be controversial, but objections
should be left to the neighbours and/or the PRA
Recommendation: No action
95320 - THE VICARAGE 29 RAMLEY ROAD PENNINGTON
registration
date: 11/03/2010
Location: Next to 95319 above,
back to back and with access on to Ramley Road
Proposal: House
Statutory Class: Minor Dwellings
Consulted: neighbours 8, others
9
History: See 95319 above
Comment: This and the preceding application are for buildings
on the subdivided plot of what was once the Vicarage.
Recommendation: No action
unless the PRA advise otherwise.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conditions
attached to 82337
1) No
development shall take place on the site until the applicant has secured the
implementation of a programme of archaeological work in accordance with a
written scheme of investigation which has been submitted by the applicant
and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Reason: The development is located
in an area of archaeological significance where the recording of archaeological
remains should be carried out prior to the development taking place in accord
with Policy DW-E23 of the New Forest District Local Plan
2) Before
development commences, a scheme for the provision and implementation of surface
water and foul drainage works shall be submitted to and approved in writing
by the Local Planning Authority. Development shall only take place in accordance
with those details which have been approved
Reason: To prevent pollution
of the water environment in accordance with policy DW-E41 of the adopted New
Forest District Local Plan.
3)
The restaurant building shall only be used as a restaurant and for no other
purpose including any other which might otherwise have been allowed by the
Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 or by the Town and Country
Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 or by any subsequent amendment
to that legislation. Reason:
To safeguard the amenities of neighbouring residential occupiers in
accordance with Policies DW-E1 and DW-E34 of the adopted New Forest District
Local Plan
4) Notwithstanding
the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)
Order 1995 or any subsequent amendment to that legislation, the restaurant
hereby approved shall not be used for the sale of hot food for consumption
off the premises.Reason: In the interests
of the amenities of the locality, in accordance with Policy DW-E1 of the adopted
New Forest District Local Plan.
5) In
each of the ten live/work units hereby approved, the work areas shall only
be occupied and used by the occupiers of the living areas above and shall
not at any time be used, sold or let independent of the living areas above.
The work areas shall only be used for Class B1 business use and for no other
purpose. Reason: To
safeguard the residential amenity of the live/work units and neighbouring
residential occupiers in accord with Policy DW-E34 of the adopted New Forest
District Local Plan.
6) No
development shall take place above damp proof course level until the following
details have been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning
Authority [list omitted]. Reason: To
ensure that the development takes place in an appropriate way in accordance
with policies DW-E1 and DW-E5 of the adopted New Forest District Local Plan.
7)
Before the development is first commenced, a scheme to deal with any contamination
of the site shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority. This scheme shall include: [list
omitted]
If any other previously undiscovered
contamination is found during the development of the site, this shall be notified
to the Local Planning Authority immediately, along with a suitable risk assessment
and where necessary, a remediation scheme. The remediation scheme shall be
approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Before any of the units on the site are first occupied, the remedial measures
shall have been completed and a statement to that effect shall be sent in
writing to the Local Planning Authority, which will include any future requirements
for the monitoring of the site.
Reason:
To ensure that any contaminated land on the site is identified and properly
treated in the interests of the well-being of nearby residents and the environment
in general in accordance with policy DW-E34 of the adopted New Forest District
Local Plan.
8)
The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of five
years from the date of this permission. Reason:
To comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
9) The
office accommodation within Block L adjacent to the entrance of the site shall
only be used for Class B1(a) office use and for no other purpose. Reason: In
the interests of the amenities of the locality, in accordance with Policy
DW-E1 of the adopted New Forest District Local Plan.
10) Whilst
the proposed development is not in accordance with Policy BU-B2 of the adopted
New Forest District Local Plan, it is considered that the scheme makes adequate
provision for employment opportunities both on and off the site. It is also
considered that the scheme would deliver additional community benefits in
the form of affordable housing and public open space, including a riverside
walkway. The design and layout of the development is considered acceptable
and one which would have a positive visual impact on its environs.
Extract
from Appeal Decision - 87244 dated 2 May 2007
25.
I allow the appeal, and grant planning permission for replacement of the approved
hotel block with a C2 use unit . . .
in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 06/87244, dated
20 January 2006, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following
conditions:
1)
The development hereby permitted shall begin before the expiration of three
years from the date of this decision.